Tom Cairns

Archives

01 May - 31 May 2007
01 Jun - 30 Jun 2007
01 Jul - 31 Jul 2007
01 Aug - 31 Aug 2007
01 Sep - 30 Sep 2007
01 Oct - 31 Oct 2007
01 Nov - 30 Nov 2007
01 Dec - 31 Dec 2007
01 Jan - 31 Jan 2008
01 Feb - 28 Feb 2008
01 Apr - 30 Apr 2008
01 May - 31 May 2008
01 May - 31 May 2009
01 Jun - 30 Jun 2009
01 Jul - 31 Jul 2009
01 Aug - 31 Aug 2009
01 Sep - 30 Sep 2009
01 Oct - 31 Oct 2009
01 Nov - 30 Nov 2009
01 Dec - 31 Dec 2009
01 Jan - 31 Jan 2010
01 Feb - 28 Feb 2010
01 Mar - 31 Mar 2010
01 Apr - 30 Apr 2010
01 May - 31 May 2010
01 Jun - 30 Jun 2010
01 Jul - 31 Jul 2010
01 Aug - 31 Aug 2010
01 Sep - 30 Sep 2010
01 Oct - 31 Oct 2010
01 Nov - 30 Nov 2010
01 Dec - 31 Dec 2010
01 Jan - 31 Jan 2011
01 Feb - 28 Feb 2011
01 Mar - 31 Mar 2011
01 Apr - 30 Apr 2011
01 May - 31 May 2011
01 Jun - 30 Jun 2011
01 Jul - 31 Jul 2011
01 Aug - 31 Aug 2011
01 Oct - 31 Oct 2011
01 Dec - 31 Dec 2011
01 Aug - 31 Aug 2012

Search!

Last Comments

Stuff

Powered by Pivot - 1.40.3: 'Dreadwind' 
XML: RSS Feed 
XML: Atom Feed 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Google does soul searching

Thursday 14 January 2010 at 3:33 pm

"GOOGLE STAND WINS PRAISE" read the headline in the LA Times Business Section on January 14, 2010.  I was eager to read the article.

Google was no longer willing to censor its Chinese-language search engine.  Google began doing that in 2006 because the Chinese government kept blocking the site.  Google wanted to gain more access to China's 300 million-internet users.  Google issued the following statement at that time. 

"While removing search results is inconsistent with Google's mission, providing no information....is more inconsistent with our mission."  Google Statement.

At the time, that was Google's business proposition.  What has changed?  The Chinese Communist Party would have you believe that Google was the victim of cyber attacks, or that Google had not overcome Baidu Inc., China's more popular search engine.  Both are true, but were these the real drivers or was there something of greater significance? 

Did Google's executives look deep inside their corporate souls and realize that providing censored information was more inconsistent with their mission than providing no information.  I believe they did some major soul searching (pun intended) and no longer could rationalize their actions as do I dare say as "right"?

Let's face it Google is well, Google, the world leader in search.  Their stock only took a 1% negative hit after this announcement.  Regardless, with executives failing left and right, our faith is renewed when a company is guided by core principles that are consistent with doing good.  Principled decision-making that is something you don't see enough of today.  We need more of this in business, education, religion; government and you name it.      

 

View Thomas Cairns, D.B.A.'s profile on LinkedIn



Trackback link:

Please enable javascript to generate a trackback url